[ad_1]
The Supreme Court has taken critical exception to a Tamil Nadu minister’s remarks on the freebies problem, with Chief Justice of India N V Ramana on Tuesday warning state counsel P Wilson, to not be beneath the impression that the feedback had been ignored by the courtroom.
“Mr Wilson, I am sorry to say, I want to say so many things. But I don’t want to, being a chief justice, talk about your party or minister… (about) what he is talking,” CJI Ramana stated whereas listening to the petitions searching for a ban on guarantees of freebies throughout polls.
Wilson is an MP from Tamil Nadu’s ruling social gathering, the DMK.
The CJI additional stated: “I don’t think wisdom belongs to only one person or one particular party…We are also responsible…The way of talking, the way of statement you are giving, don’t think that we are ignoring, that we are closing our eyes.”
Tamil Nadu Finance Minister Palanivel Thiagarajan had just lately informed TV news channel NDTV that he didn’t perceive the function of the courts in deciding the difficulty of freebies.
Replying to a question on whether or not there was a distinction between distribution of free ration and different objects comparable to TVs, the minister is quoted to have stated: “Whatever that distinction is, it’s not clear to me that the Supreme Court, TV anchors or the Finance Commission is the right authority under the Constitution to make that distinction.”
He additional added: “The voters will make their minds based on whether they like it or don’t like it…(whether) they re-elect or don’t elect. I don’t understand what the role of the court is in this. Since when does any country’s Constitution allow the Supreme Court to decide how public money is spent?”
Though the CJI didn’t identify the minister, the submissions by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who represents the petitioner demanding the ban on freebies, made it amply clear what the courtroom was alluding to.
“I have seen all those interviews that the Finance minister of Tamil Nadu (P Thiagarajan) has given and the kind of language he has used for the Supreme Court. I think that it’s completely unacceptable., They have their domain. They should respect it,” stated Sankaranarayanan, including “I think your Lordships were extremely gracious in not taking notice of it and your Lordships may ignore it”.
[ad_2]
Source link
Comments are closed.