fourteen – The Alike

It’s time to match the Ryzen 7 5700X with Core i7-12700F, two comparatively inexpensive and highly effective 8-core processors. We now know that the Intel processor prices a bit extra and we’re positive that some will argue that Core i5-12600KF perhaps it’s a “more fair” match, however it’s been closely requested, so let’s see what’s between the 2 in the intervening time.

At the time of writing, the Intel 12700F may very well be bought for $310whereas the 5700X is barely cheaper in $285, or about 9% surcharge for an Intel processor. In different areas similar to Australia, the 5700X often sells for $425 and the 12700F for $480 (AUD), which is a little more costly for the Intel half, however your mileage will little doubt be totally different.

It’s most likely price noting that in Australia the 5700X is about 10% costlier than 12600KF and simply over 20% costlier than the bottom 12600 mannequin, so whichever means you go, it received’t be fully apples to apples by way of pricing. But most of all, we’re to see how the 5700X and 12700F carry out in video games, so let’s get on with it.

For this now we have a 23 recreation check overlaying 1080p and 1440p resolutions utilizing each Radeon RH 6950 HT in addition to Radeon RH 6600 HT with SAM enabled.

The motherboard used to check the Ryzen 7 5700X is an previous MSI B350 Tomahawk with the newest BIOS primarily based on AGESA microcode which incorporates Resizable BAR together with help for Ryzen 5000 processors. is inside just a few % of what we see with the newest and biggest X570 boardswhich makes the upgrades very sensible.

We’re caught with B350 Tomahawk for a number of causes. First, we already had the info, and we all know it’s corresponding to what we’d get with the newer and costlier X570 boards. It additionally paints a reasonably new image for AMD’s processor, on condition that it not solely runs on a 5-year-old motherboard, but in addition competes very effectively in doing so.

Meanwhile, for the 12700F, we’d like a model new motherboard, and we use the motherboard for testing. $260 MSI Z690 Tomahawk DDR4, which we’ll discuss in additional element on the finish of this text. For each methods, we opted for 32GB of dual-rank, dual-channel DDR4-3200 CL14 reminiscence.

With these particulars out of the way in which, let’s check out a few of the video games we examined, after which check out the common of 23 video games.


Beginning with Fortnite, we discovered the 12700F and 5700X to be similar to one another, and each supply top-notch options. The Ryzen processor was 4% quicker, which is negligible, so the distinction is shut sufficient to name it a draw.

Recently whereas testing Ryzen 7 5800X3D we discovered the cache-heavy CPU to be a beast in ACC, delivering one of the best efficiency we’ve ever seen on this recreation.

However, inventory Zen 3 processors aren’t that spectacular, and we are able to see right here that the 12700F is 40% quicker than the 5700X when wanting on the 1% lows.

The common body charge headroom is about half that determine. However, even utilizing the 6600 XT at 1440p 1% lows is improved by 14% with the Intel processor, which is a powerful consequence for the 12700F.

Cyberpunk 2077 works finest with the 12700F when testing extra CPU sure situations similar to 1080p with the Radeon RX 6950 XT the place the Intel half was 37% quicker. That headroom was vastly decreased at 1440p, though common body charges had been principally the identical, though the 12700F was 13% quicker when taking a look at 1% lows. Then when utilizing the 6600 XT, efficiency was the identical as we weren’t closely GPU sure utilizing any of these processors.

CS:GO is extraordinarily CPU-limited when utilizing a 6600 XT or 6950 XT, however like an previous recreation, it’s not CPU-limited anymore within the sense of not totally using fashionable CPUs, so it’s a software program bottleneck greater than anything . .

Here the 12700F was 22% quicker thanks to higher single-core efficiency, however each processors allowed for a 1% drop to over 170fps with averages effectively over 300fps.

Rainbow Six Extraction is an instance of a recreation that may be performed at tons of of frames per second on fashionable CPUs, however is totally GPU-limited utilizing the second highest high quality preset.

Both the 5700X and 12700F constantly delivered over 200fps in our check, leading to a mean body charge of over 300fps. It’s quick sufficient.

Then now we have F1 2021 and it begins getting CPU-bound with the 5700X as quickly as we crank it as much as 300fps. Again, that is greater than most avid gamers want for this recreation. So whereas the 12700F was 16% quicker than the 6950 XT at 1080p, it doesn’t actually matter because the 5700X constantly retains body charges above 200fps.

Forza Horizon 5 is a good and widespread racing recreation that doesn’t use a lot CPU. Both processors can hit over 200fps when the GPU is able to it. The 12700F took a 5% lead over the 6950 XT at 1080p, however it’s actually a minor distinction that no gamer will discover.

Hitman 3 is a CPU intensive recreation that makes superb use of these CPUs. Here the 12700F has a transparent efficiency benefit, bettering low frequencies by 1% by as much as 22%. Interestingly, even with the a lot slower 6600 XT, the 12700F was 17% quicker at 1080p, suggesting there’s some type of Ryzen CPU or latency problem on this title.

Riftbreaker is one other recreation that performs higher with Intel’s Alder Lake structure, boosting 1% lows from the 6950 XT at 1080p by as a lot as 41% whereas additionally rising common body charges by 27%.

That’s a reasonably important lead and it’s not till we get to the 6600 XT that the headroom narrows, however even at 1080p the 12700F was nonetheless 12% quicker.

The final recreation we take a look at in particular person outcomes is Watch Dogs Legion, probably the most CPU and GPU intensive video games we’ve examined. The 12700F was 16-17% quicker than the 5700X when examined with the 6950 XT at 1080p, and the fields had been the identical even at 1440p. In truth, even with the 6600 XT the 12700F was 13% quicker, and it wasn’t till we bumped up the decision to 1440p that the hole narrowed to a negligible margin.

23 video games on common

In all video games examined, the Core i7-12700F was on common 7% quicker when contemplating common FPS than the 5700X, whereas 1% lows had been improved by 10% when utilizing the 6950 XT at 1080p. This is just not a major enhance, however nonetheless a worthwhile mixture for Intel. At 1440p, these numbers method 9% for the 1% low and simply 4% for the common body charge.

Meanwhile, these of you utilizing extra mid-range GPUs will see a good smaller distinction. For instance, with the 6600 XT, the 12700F was solely 5% quicker on common for 1% low frequencies and a couple of% quicker for mid body charges at 1080p. Then we see no actual distinction in efficiency at 1440p regardless of a mean body charge of simply over 100fps.

Looking at 1080p margins for every recreation utilizing the 6950 XT – probably the most CPU capped check outcomes now we have for this comparability – the 5700X was on common 6% slower, and whereas we see a minimum of one recreation the place he was taller. 20% quicker, there are 4 examples the place the pace was greater than 20% slower.

Only 9 of the 23 video games examined had a distinction of 5% or much less in both course, which means there have been solely 3 cases the place the 5700X received by a major margin and 10 the place it misplaced.

Using a much less excessive GPU just like the 6600 XT considerably decreased the efficiency distinction seen between the 2 CPUs and now even at 1080p the 5700X was solely 2% slower on common.

Death Stranding is the one recreation to considerably outperform Ryzen, whereas Watch Dogs Legion and ACC had been the one video games the place it misplaced by a major margin.

The finest 8-core processor for avid gamers

So which processor is healthier? It will depend on just a few issues… The apparent situation to get out of the way in which is the improve path for individuals who have already got an awesome AM4 motherboard. If you fall into this case, then probably the most cost-effective choice could be to make use of the 5700X.

Now, for brand spanking new system builders, the selection is far much less apparent, so let’s break down the prices. The 5700X is at present priced at $285 and an honest B550 board just like the MSI B550M Pro-VDH WiFi prices an additional $100, so it’s a $385 combo.

Cost 12700F $310 and one of the best price range B660 boards in the intervening time are MSI Pro B660M-A and B660M Bazooka and each are $140 so the mixture is $450. As for the motherboard and CPU, you get a 15-20% markup while you go to Intel, though when you’re constructing a $1500 PC the distinction is just ~5%. Or, when you’re constructing one thing nearer to $1,000 or extra, there’s lower than a ten% distinction within the value of all the system.

In phrases of gaming efficiency, which we simply lined, 12700F typically quicker, which, in our opinion, justifies the worth enhance. If you don’t plan on upgrading within the close to future, then we predict the Core i7-12700F is one of the best long-term funding because it’s typically quicker now, and higher single-core efficiency will enhance it in future video games.

If you alter your thoughts sooner or later, you should have the choice to improve to a thirteenth Gen Raptor Lake processor. We don’t but know if there can be any first rate choices for the 12700F proprietor, so it’s extra more likely to be attainable proper now.

We’re much less drawn to the Ryzen 7 5700X for individuals who haven’t invested within the AM4 but. It is definitely an awesome gaming processor, however there are not any actual benefits that will permit me to decide on it over the 12700F. Apart from gaming, the 12700F additionally much more powerful processor as these 4 E-cores work wonders for top efficiency workloads.

AMD followers might level to energy consumption and working temperatures, however the reality is that the 12700F cools simply as simply because the 5700X, and gaming energy consumption is sort of an identical. Then, when operating workloads with extra cores, the facility consumption of the 12700F and 5700X is just not a lot totally different, and the efficiency per watt leads to favor of the Core i7.

Ultimately, you’ll be fully proud of both choice, as each are glorious gaming processors that deal with the newest and biggest video games with ease and can proceed to ship high efficiency for years to return.

Trade Labels:
  • Intel Core i7-12700F on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 7 5700X on Amazon
  • MSI Z690 Tomahawk WiFi DDR4 Amazon
  • MSI B350 Tomahawk on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X on Amazon
  • Intel Core i9-12900K on Amazon
  • Intel Core i5-12600K on Amazon

The put up fourteen appeared first on Nerdshala.

Source link

Comments are closed.