Nupur Sharma Prophet remarks: SC permits clubbing of FIRs towards Times Now anchor Navika Kumar


The Supreme Court on Friday ordered that each one first data studies filed towards Times Now anchor Navika Kumar, in a case associated to suspended Bharatiya Janata Party spokesperson Nupur Sharma’s comment about Prophet Muhammad, can be transferred to Delhi, Live Law reported.

Sharma made the feedback on May 26 throughout a Times Now debate, which was moderated by Kumar. A day later, the news channel distanced itself from Sharma’s feedback.

FIRs have been registered towards Kumar in Maharashtra, West Bengal, Delhi and Jammu and Kashmir for outraging spiritual emotions.

The anchor had approached the Supreme Court in August demanding that both the FIRs towards her ought to be quashed, or they be clubbed collectively and transferred to 1 state.

On Friday, a bench of Justices MR Shah and Krishna Murari mentioned that the court docket’s course may also be relevant to any FIRs filed towards the anchor sooner or later, Bar and Bench reported.

The bench additionally mentioned that no coercive motion can be taken towards Kumar for eight weeks.

“The petitioner is at liberty to move the [Delhi] High Court for quashing of the lead FIR,” the bench mentioned.

Nupur Sharma’s comment

Sharma’s remarks towards Prophet Muhammad had led to a spate of violence and unrest throughout a number of components of the nation in June. There was additionally a diplomatic outrage from various Gulf nations. Two males – one in Maharashtra and one other in Rajasthan – have been killed for supporting her.

On July 19, Sharma was granted interim safety from arrest by the Supreme Court within the circumstances filed towards her.

Notably, on July 1, a bench headed by Justice Surya Kant on the Supreme Court mentioned that Sharma ought to have apologised to the nation for her remarks.

The judges had additionally orally mentioned that Sharma was single-handedly liable for the tensions within the nation and that being a spokesperson of a nationwide political celebration doesn’t give anybody the freedom to talk “such disturbing things”.

“These are not religious people at all, they make statements to provoke,” the judges mentioned whereas asking Sharma to method the High Courts.



Source link

Comments are closed.