Supreme Court closes 2009 contempt case in opposition to Prashant Bhushan, Tarun Tejpal after apology

The Supreme Court on Tuesday closed a 2009 contempt of court docket case in opposition to advocate Prashant Bhushan and former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal in view of their apologies to the court docket.

The case in opposition to Bhushan and Tejpal had been filed by senior advocate Harish Salve in reference to an interview revealed in Tehelka journal, during which Bhushan made allegations of corruption within the judiciary.

Bhushan, in his assertion to the Court, stated he had “no intention to lower the prestige of the judiciary in which I have complete faith”.

“In my interview to Tehelka in 2009, I have used the word corruption in a wide sense meaning lack of propriety. I did not mean only financial corruption or deriving any pecuniary advantage. If what I have said caused hurt to any of them or to their families in any way, I regret the same. I unreservedly state that I support the institution of the judiciary and especially the Supreme Court of which I am a part, and had no intention to lower the prestige of the judiciary in which I have complete faith. …I regret if my interview was misunderstood as doing so…” he stated.

On Tuesday, a bench of Justices Indira Banerjee, Surya Kant and M M Sundresh noticed, “In view of the apologies made by the contemnors, we don’t deem it necessary to continue the matter.”

In one other case, Bhushan in 2020 was discovered responsible of legal contempt of court docket by the Supreme Court for 2 tweets which it stated have been primarily based on “distorted facts”, constituted a “scurrilous/malicious… attack” on the “entire Supreme Court”, and had the impact of “destabilising the very foundation” of the judiciary.

— with inputs from Bar and Bench and Live Law

Source link

Source link

Comments are closed.