Transcript: Rep. Mike Turner on


The following is a transcript of an interview with GOP Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio that aired Sunday, Dec. 4, 2022, on “Face the Nation.”

MARGARET BRENNAN: And we flip now to Ohio Congressman Mike Turner, the highest Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. Congressman Turner, good to have you ever right here in particular person.

REPRESENTATIVE MIKE TURNER: Thank you. Yes. It’s nice to be right here.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So simply yesterday, the Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines mentioned that Russia was maybe struggling to maintain up with the quantity of munitions that it is utilizing on this battle in Ukraine, the chilly climate is slowing fight. The Secretary of State, although, did not actually give hope for diplomacy at this second. Given what you already know, when will this battle finish?

REP. TURNER: Well, the one factor that we all know is that the- the positive factors that Ukraine is making are actual, they’re actual within the battlefield. They’re actual within the help that they’ve around the globe, they’ve with democracies on the ground of the United Nations, in condemning this aggression by Russia. But Ukraine actually must be the one which decides that if, when, and the way negotiations are entered into, and at this level, you already know, they’re battling for his or her nation. They’re shedding lives for democracy. President Zelenskyy says, I used to be simply in Ukraine, simply earlier than the elections, he says overtly, he understands that he is the frontlines for democracy, and he is combating an authoritarian regime. And I feel, you already know, clearly, Russia has to reevaluate how they have a look at this battle and the way Putin seems to be at what he has began–

MARGARET BRENNAN: So you agree with the administration on this?

REP. TURNER: I agree completely. That that is, that is one thing the place, that this can be a battle of aggression, that Russia must reevaluate and to withdraw from Ukraine.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve mentioned, since you are poised to run the intelligence committees since you might be on the prime Republican when Republicans take management in January. Is this going to be an space the place as you promised, you’ll be able to take politics out of it and truly work throughout the aisle? What does that imply?

REP. TURNER: Right. So, you already know, we have, after I went we went on a bipartisan journey to ship to President Zelenskyy a message that there is bipartisan help for Ukraine. I feel there’s a variety of points that we will be engaged on a bipartisan foundation. What ought to the United States coverage be? How can we make sure that the I serve on the Armed Service Committee and the Intelligence Committee? How can we make sure that they get the weapon techniques that they want? How can we maintain collectively this world alliance that-that we’ve the place the world is condemning what Russia is doing? And in fact, the enlargement of NATO, we’re wanting ahead to Sweden and Finland, becoming a member of NATO, which is the alternative of what Putin believed he was going to attain and attacking Ukraine. He’s now sees the enlargement by two priceless companions with nice army capabilities becoming a member of NATO.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I wish to present our viewers some fairly extraordinary video that the Pentagon unveiled this week, a B-21 Raider. It’s the primary US nuclear stealth bomber plane in additional than 30 years. And it is being packaged as this deterrent to Chin- to China. How involved are you in regards to the tempo of Beijing’s nuclear improvement?

REP. TURNER: Extremely, and I wish to co-co-commend the-the administration as a result of they have been very ahead leaning in releasing and declassifying details about what China is doing. They are increasing their nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons capabilities, their ICBMs which can be focusing on the United States. This airplane is extremely necessary. I served as chair of the air and land subcommittee as we, on a categorized foundation, started the method of engaged on this airplane. And it offers us a further stability, as a result of it is a further supply automobile, extra approach to fight what China’s doing–

MARGARET BRENNAN: to drop nuclear weapons?

REP. TURNER: to trigger folks to not drop nuclear weapons. I imply, that is what’s so–

MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s- it is actually the deterrent.

REP. TURNER: Right. It is to make sure that the stability of energy is there so that folks perceive that the-that the price is simply too nice. When China is increasing the nuclear weapons, they’re United States if we blink if we do not, if we do not reply, they usually assume that they’ll get first strike capabilities that not solely holds us at bay, however actually holds us in danger, as a result of then you’ve got the chief of a nuclear energy that may make that miscalculation and naturally, value unfathomable lives.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You talked about being open about intelligence. I’m questioning, in your new position, will you be asking the Director of National Intelligence for a briefing and a harm evaluation associated to Mar-a-Lago and the paperwork the previous president took to his non-public house?

REP. TURNER: That’s already in course of. I imply, we have already talked–

MARGARET BRENNAN: It hasn’t occurred. In the brand new Congress will you ask for it?


REP. TURNER:  Yes. I’ve simply talked to the director of nationwide intelligence about this explicit subject. One subject that we’ve mentioned with the director, which could be very, very attention-grabbing is is that, you already know, previous to the Mar-a-Lago and raid, nobody within the intelligence group or within the nationwide safety group was engaged in any respect by the FBI to request an evaluation as to what the chance of the paperwork that had been surrendered from Mar-a-Lago,or that may have been at Mar-a-Lago, or that have been even perceived as being lacking– 

MARGARET BRENNAN: And you the Justice Department–


REP. TURNER: This was simply the FBI and the and the archivist, which is mainly a glorified librarian, coming collectively and deciding to raid Mar-a-Lago. Now-

MARGARET BRENNAN: But you are not downplaying that taking categorized materials to your non-public house is an issue notably for the commander in chief.

REP. TURNER: Absolutely not. There have been just- there have been different choices that the FBI had versus the escalation that- that they did. That’s actually going to be one of many questions we’ve. The Director of National Intelligence indicated they’ve performed their threat evaluation, and they’re ready to present each of our committees on the Senate and the House shows as to what these are– 

MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you’ve got a way of when or what the dimensions of the harm is? 

REP. TURNER: At this level it is only a scheduling subject. We simply had a gathering with the director, however each Sen. Warner, myself and Adam Schiff. And as they give the impression of being to how can we get all people scheduled collectively, and people who’ve completed the evaluation, as a result of once more, it isn’t only a director that might be coming–


REP. TURNER: They’ll have to return ahead to present us, what did they see, what did they’ve, and the way do they understand the risk that will or could not have existed from a few of these paperwork.

MARGARET BRENNAN: This could appear a fundamental query, however all elected leaders swear to uphold the Constitution. Does calling for its suspension, is that disqualifying for a presidential candidate?

REP. TURNER: It’s actually not constant–

MARGARET BRENNAN: You know why I’m asking this query?

REP. TURNER: I do. It’s actually not in step with the oath that all of us take.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So yesterday, the entrance runner for the Republican nomination, the usual bearer in your celebration, posted on Truth Social, and we all know he misplaced the 2020 election, however continues to say he didn’t. “A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution.” Should the usual bearer for the Republican Party, the entrance runner for the nomination for the presidency in your celebration in 2024, say this?

REP. TURNER: Well, I you already know, I, to start with, I vehemently disagree with- with the assertion that Trump has made. Trump has made, you already know, 1,000 statements wherein I disagree. There is a political course of that has to go ahead earlier than anyone–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Constitutional conservatives are fairly clear about the place they worth the structure– 

REP. TURNER: Exactly. There must be–


REP. TURNER: You do get picked questions, however I do get to choose my reply.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I do know. I’m attempting to get you to reply the query I’m asking.

REP. TURNER: There is a political course of that has to go for earlier than anyone’s a entrance runner or anyone is a- even the candidate for the celebration–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you condemn him saying one thing like this?

REP. TURNER:  Absolutely. And I consider answering your query that folks actually are going to think about an announcement like this as they consider a candidate.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I additionally should ask you in regards to the different assertion and the those who he has been spending time with, a neo-Nazi, pro-Putin misogynist, named Nick Fuentes got here to have dinner with the previous president at his house alongside Kanye West who simply this previous week, praised Hitler.

REP. TURNER: This is atrocious. This is- all people I feel- everybody each condemns and is shocked and is as disgusted and nauseated by the truth that we’re even on this 12 months, in 2022, having anybody that may make statements like that, however, have anyone who would interact in a dialog with somebody who’s having- making statements like that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So having categorized paperwork on the similar place the place they’re having the dinner– 

REP. TURNER: Well that’s- that is not–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –which we’re not essentially securely held, they usually’re authorities information that ought to be in authorities property, all these issues collectively, it is an issue.

REP. TURNER: Well, as you already know, the FBI raided his house, and I suppose there usually are not categorized paperwork there. But all of those are problems with judgment.

MARGARET BRENNAN: The president is saying he does not know who he is having dinner with at that house.

REP. TURNER: These are all problems with judgment and a political course of has to go ahead. And I consider voters are sensible, they usually’ll take these issues into consideration in a political course of.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Congressman, thanks for approaching and answering questions. We’ll be again in only one minute so stick with us.


Source link

Comments are closed.