Wow, Facebook actually is aware of trick somebody!

So a lot for this contact farewell post Sheryl Sandberg, which Mark Zuckerberg posted simply 9 days in the past when, after 14 years at Facebook — now Meta Platforms — Sandberg introduced she was stepping down as COO. At the time, Zuckerberg referred to as Sandberg’s deliberate departure “the end of an era” and raved about her as “an amazing person, leader, partner and friend.”

– Advertisement –

Today, the WSJ stories — for the second time since Sandburg stepped down — that Facebook has been investigating Sandburg since at the least the autumn of 2019. possible misuse of corporate resources. Under consideration: whether or not she had Facebook staff concerned within the work that supported her Lean In Foundation, whose mission is to advertise ladies’s management and inclusion within the office; whether or not she engaged Facebook staff to write down and promote her second ebook, Option B, about dealing with the sudden loss of life of her husband in 2015; and eventually, whether or not she diverted the time and a spotlight of Facebook employees to her upcoming marriage ceremony this summer time.

– Advertisement –

Wow. What a monster, proper?

We don’t know who’s leaking the small print of this investigation to the WSJ, but when “people familiar with the matter” are attempting to destroy her popularity, they’re doing a ridiculously awful job. (We beforehand contacted Facebook for extra info and have but to obtain a response from the corporate.)

– Advertisement –

First, nobody considers Sheryl Sandberg an angel. If they ever did, they reassessed years in the past, after quite a few scandals, from Facebook’s obvious ambivalence about information privateness to its dealing with of Facebook’s public relations following the publicity of Russia’s meddling within the platform in the course of the presidential election. within the US in 2016. (Although Zuckerberg initially staged an apology tour, she launched an aggressive lobbying marketing campaign in opposition to Facebook critics.)

Obviously, it takes a sure kind of individuals to run a rule-breaking firm like Facebook, and you may’t assist it develop into one of the highly effective firms in world historical past with out polluting it much more. However, a more moderen story leaked to the magazine in April succeeded in elevating questions on Sandberg much more. According to the report, Sandberg, who beforehand met with Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick, twice insisted that the British tabloid shelve a possible story about him, counting on a crew that included each Facebook and Activision staff, in addition to paid exterior consultants.

Many had been involved concerning the chance that Sandberg may probably use his muscle mass on this means. But the most recent articles on Sandberg are very completely different. In truth, we hope these leaks about investigations into potential misuse of Sandberg’s property come from Sandberg and her associates. Talk about sensible shenanigans, in that case.

Think about it. At Sandburg, we’ve got a robust COO, a girl who has lengthy been seen as a big a part of Facebook’s progress and is beneath investigation for counting on staff to a) create a corporation for ladies, b) write a ebook about overcoming grief. , primarily for ladies, and in .) being an individual who plans a joyful marriage ceremony after an unimaginable loss.

If Facebook actually desires to object to Sandberg planning a marriage throughout work hours, so be it. softening.

Alas, we don’t actually suppose Sandburg is in search of protection in The Magazine. A extra probably situation is that there are individuals inside Facebook who wish to work. If so, their efforts to take down Sandberg may backfire, except these inner investigations are reportedly the results of hiring her first Compliance Director final yr led to way more disclosure.

At this level, Sandberg is more likely to obtain the world’s worst firing from an organization to which she has remained loyal longer than virtually some other government besides Zuckerberg himself. In truth, The Journal notes, it’s already well-known that each Sandberg and Zuckerberg use company sources to resolve some private points. Facebook even makes “extensive disclosures” about this stuff in its laws, the newspaper notes.

Meanwhile, these gradual leaks make Facebook appear petty and vengeful—even bordering on the absurd. According to the WSJ: “Some at Meta close to the investigation are concerned about potential SEC violations if Ms. Sandberg used professional resources for personal matters without proper disclosure, although it is not yet clear what such violations might be.” , acquainted individuals with this mentioned.

Comments are closed.